An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites always use a .gov or .mil domain. Before sharing sensitive information online, make sure you’re on a .gov or .mil site by inspecting your browser’s address (or “location”) bar.

This site is also protected by an SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate that’s been signed by the U.S. government. The https:// means all transmitted data is encrypted — in other words, any information or browsing history that you provide is transmitted securely.

Comments (7) -

  • p.29 "developing cost-effective methods to carry out genome analyses"
    It is also worth explicitly stating here that cost effectiveness is at least partly reliant on data sharing and reproducibility.
  • p. 29 "Genome-enabled parentage and traceability are used to address questions associated with species management and product quality."
    Tracebility can also address food safety concerns and tie in with "food to fork" initiatives but this has not really been addressed in US livestock production the same way it has in other countries (e.g., https://goo.gl/S8zYJ6).
  • p.29 "To implement improvements in genome-enabled selection in more animal species...include trait-relevant transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic information."
    Since genome-enabled technologies have been applied where there is a clear economic gain, then the argument needs to be made for the gain (and likewise investment) in these other species.
  • p.29 Collect new and more extensive phenotypes:
    One of the major problems with the collection & integration of phenotype data is that this data must be available in an easily queryable common format for others to derive value from it. Phenotype and trait ontologies exist but are poorly utilized in animal genomics, and because of this much data is lost or unusable.
  • p.30 Identify causal alleles:
    I agree with this statement but it does not specifically recognize that many important production traits are multigenic and that regulatory elements are largely undetermined.  Both of these factors create a gap in translating genotype to phenotype. For example, many SNPs linked with traits map to areas that currently annotated as "intergenic" but are likely to contain key regulatory elements.
  • p.30 "1. Comprehensive collection of relevant environmental (including management), genotype, and phenotype information"

    Again, data (& metadata) about environment and phenotype need to be collected, analyzed, shared and stored in a common agreed upon formats that also allow comparative studies across conditions and species. It should be explicitly stated that increasing data acquisition without appropriate attention to data management is wasted time, money and effort.
  • p.31. Resources required should include a workforce that is "data-savvy" - this is, if not specifically trained to do their own data analyses, then able to understand fundamentals of data management.

Add comment

Loading

v 3.3.8.259